|
(Published in the Idaho Business Review, March 2006)
You are an owner, developer or contractor and an unjustified
mechanic's lien is recorded against your project. After your temper
cools and you realize that you cannot ignore the problem, you will
inevitably ask yourself: What can I do?
The first issue to consider is whether to pay the lien. This
requires a realistic evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the
lien. The person asserting the lien will receive attorneys' fees if he
is successful in litigation. A person that successfully defends a lien,
however, may or may not be entitled to attorneys' fees. This depends on
the other claims brought in the lawsuit. In instances where a party
does not have a right to attorneys' fees if he prevails, it is not
going to be a fair fight - the owner may spend more defending the lien
(if it is not large) than he will spend buying his way out of the
problem by paying the claimant.
If payment is not acceptable or practical, three choices may be available:
A. Leave the lien in place;
B. Persuade a title insurance company to protect the parties; or
C. File a petition with the court to substitute a bond for the property subject to the lien.
If no sale or financing of the property will occur for six (6)
months, simply waiting may be the best solution. The lien will expire
unless a lawsuit is filed within six months from the date the lien was
recorded. Shortly after the expiration of six months, title will be
insurable if no action to foreclose the lien has been filed by the lien
claimant. A large percentage of all liens are discharged in this
manner.
A second solution, which may be the best if financing or a sale is
pending, is to persuade a title insurance company to provide acceptable
title insurance notwithstanding the recording of the lien. Typically,
the title company will want a cash deposit in an amount of at least 1.5
times the lien amount. The excess covers court costs and attorneys'
fees, which are included in the lien if the title company has to
ultimately pay it to protect the title to the property. If the lien is
relatively small (perhaps less than $10,000.00-$20,000.00), the title
company may want substantially more to cover a potential attorneys'
fees award.
If you are going to attempt to obtain title insurance, be certain
the insurance will be acceptable to your prospective buyer or lender.
There are two ways the insurance can be handled.
The first is through a policy that does not show the lien as an
exception and, therefore, the policy insures against loss due to
foreclosure of the lien. This is the preferable approach and normally
will be acceptable to most buyers and lenders. The title company may
want to disclose to the buyer and lender that there is a lien and they
are insuring it.
The second approach is to include the lien as an exception to
coverage, but then include an affirmative statement that the title
company insures the buyer or lender against loss due to foreclosure of
the lien. This frequently will not be acceptable to a variety of
lenders, including lenders who intend to sell the loan.
About ten years ago, the Idaho Legislature added a third potential
solution by allowing an owner (or other person with an interest in the
property) to provide a surety bond in 1.5 times the amount of the lien.
The effect is to completely discharge the lien on the property, and the
lien claimant's rights are transferred to payment under the bond. There
are some disadvantages to this procedure, including:
A. The cost of obtaining the bond;
B. The bond and petition must be filed in district court and they must
be approved by the court at a hearing. This requires a lawyer and the
proceeding will take somewhere between 5 and 40 days;
C. It is cheaper for the claimant to proceed against the bond than it is to foreclose the lien and recovery may be more certain;
D. The claimant may have the right to demand a trial within 30) days; and/or
E. The claimant may not be required to proceed with an action within six months from the lien recording.
In any particular situation, any one of the foregoing alternatives
may be the way to proceed. Simply waiting six months is the simplest
and may be the best solution. From an owner's standpoint, if the
general contractor is required to take care of the lien, obtaining a
bond is most advantageous because it fully and completely removes the
lien from the property. Effectively dealing with a title insurance
company is a good compromise and in our experience, it is far more
common than a proceeding to file a bond.
Arnold L. Wagner is a partner of Meuleman Mollerup LLP, focusing his
practice in the areas of complex commercial litigation, contracts and
construction law. Mr. Wagner can be reached at 208.342.6066, or by
email
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
; more information at www.lawidaho.com.
|