|
(published by Idaho Business Review, December 20, 2004)
As many local general contractors and developers
are becoming all too aware, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (“EPA”) is currently stepping up its storm
water pollution control enforcement efforts on construction projects
in southwestern Idaho. As evidence of these enforcement efforts,
the EPA has levied stiff fines to a number of general contractors
for failing to comply with the terms of EPA’s Construction
General Permit (“General Permit”). EPA is authorized
to fine first time violators up to $32,500 per day for each violation.
Additionally, first time violators can also face criminal penalties
of up to one (1) year in prison. Second time violators and individuals
who knowingly violate the terms of the General Permit are subject
to even stiffer penalties. Because of the severity of the penalties
that may be imposed for non-compliance, it is critical for every
Idaho general contractor and developer to ensure that their project
is General Permit compliant before commencing upon any new construction
project.
Congress recently expanded the scope of the Clean
Water Act to include a Storm Water Pollution Control Program that
regulates storm water runoff from certain construction sites.
Unfettered storm water runoff can be erosive and may contain high
enough levels of sedimentation to affect water quality. Consequently,
responsible parties must receive a storm water discharge permit
for construction sites before beginning construction. In the interest
of promoting efficiency, EPA does not issue individual site-specific
permits for each and every construction site that it regulates.
Instead, EPA has issued the General Permit to function as a general
body of regulation establishing the Best Management Practices
(“BMPs”) for controlling site erosion and limiting
the amounts of sedimentation contained in storm water runoff from
any construction site. The most common BMPs include silt fences,
graveled and rocked construction entrances, straw wattle erosion
control mats, boulder check dams and lined drainage retention
ponds. The General Permit requires the responsible parties to
design a site-specific Storm Water Protection Plan (“Site
Plan”) implementing BMPs that will adequately control site
erosion and limit the amount of sedimentation contained in the
storm water runoff throughout that particular project. EPA then
enforces the General Permit and the Site Plan by ensuring that
the BMPs are adequate and that they are properly implemented.
EPA is mandated to issue penalties for any violation of the General
Permit or the Site Plan that allows storm water to discharge into
a storm sewer or waterway.
The first step in the General Permit process is to file a Notice
of Intent (“Notice”) with EPA. To promote the ease
of filing, EPA has recently instituted a new e-filing program
that allows Notices to be filed online; however, they may still
be filed by mail. The Notice must be filed at least seven (7)
days before construction activities begin on the project site.
A Notice essentially alerts EPA that someone intends to commence
regulated construction activities in a specific location. Thereafter,
EPA can enforce the terms of the General Permit and the Site Plan
for the particular project. Without the Notice requirement, EPA
would be virtually impotent since they would have to first discover
constructions sites before they could enforce violations. Consequently,
EPA considers the failure to file a Notice to be a serious violation
of the General Permit.
Anyone who is authorized to exercise control over
the project Site Plan, storm water conveyance designs, storm water
control designs, or who is responsible for overseeing the construction
of the project are considered responsible parties that may be
held liable for non-compliance with the General Permit or the
Site Plan. Obviously, most general contractors, owners, and developers
fall within these categories. Consequently, they all must file
Notices with EPA as co-permittees under the General Permit. Subcontractors,
however, are not subject to liability for General Permit violations.
Because subcontractors are not subject to liability, general contractors
should strongly consider incorporating provisions into sub-contractual
agreements that expressly indemnify the general contractor against
any fines, penalties, costs or damages that they might incur as
a result of the actions or inactions of a subcontractor due to
the violation of any environmental law.
The EPA regulates both large and small construction
projects within the state of Idaho under the terms of the General
Permit. “Large construction activities” include any
construction activity that will disturb, or that is part of a
“common plan” to cumulatively disturb, five (5) or
more acres of land. For example, if a developer builds a house
on a half-acre lot within a six (6) acre subdivision development,
it is considered a “large construction activity.”
All large construction activities must comply with all terms of
the General Permit. “Small construction activities”
include any construction activity that will disturb, or is part
of a “common plan” that will cumulatively disturb,
between one (1) to five (5) acres of land. In general they too
must comply with the General Permit, but unlike large construction
activities, waivers are available for certain small construction
activities. Two types of waivers are available. In order to receive
a waiver, the developer and/or general contractor must apply to
the EPA prior to commencing any construction.
The first kind of waiver is based upon the amount
of predicted rainfall erosivity for the area in which the construction
project is located. Small construction activities can qualify
for this waiver only if the common plan of cumulative development
starts and finishes entirely within a period of “low predicted
rainfall erosivity.” Based upon the EPA’s online rainfall
erosivity calculator (see
http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/waiver.cfm) a
small construction activity in Ada County must begin no earlier
than June 1 and end no later than September 1 of the same year
in order to qualify for the waiver. Failure to complete the entire
common plan of cumulative development by September 1 would obligate
the responsible party to file a Notice, design a Site Plan and
fully comply with all other General Permit terms. Obviously, complying
with these requirements could severely impact the ultimate completion
date of the project.
The second type of waiver is based upon the total maximum daily
load of pollutants already within potentially affected waterways.
In order to qualify, the erosive sediments anticipated from construction
site runoff must not cause any affected waterway to exceed its
allowable total maximum daily load of pollutants. The Idaho Department
of Environmental Quality typically makes this determination.
General contractors and developers should be aware,
however, that very few projects will qualify for a waiver. Therefore,
they should always be prepared to comply with the terms of the
General Permit.
Richard L. Stacey is an associate with the law firm Meuleman
Mollerup LLP, practicing in the areas of construction law, environmental
law and complex commercial litigation. Mr. Stacy can be reached
at 208.342.6066 by email at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
|